As mentioned previously in the Mordecai posts, the research
below is taken from my thesis work completed at Denver Seminary. As such, it
would be help to know the following while reading this post:
My thesis was entitled, “Using a Biblical Third Culture
Model to study the Lives of Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, and Mordecai.” The
Third Culture Model I developed was based largely off of David C. Pollock and
Ruth E Van Reken’s Third Culture Kids:
Growing Up Among Worlds[1] in which Pollock and Van Reken explore the culture differences of
children that have grown up or spent a significant amount of their childhood
and formative years overseas and outside of their passport country.[2] They reason that a third
culture kid’s (TCK’s) first culture is that of their passport country, their
second culture is the one in which they currently live, and their third culture
is the one they develop as they try to balance the values of both cultures.
Pollock and Van Reken found that the characteristics of TCKs are similar
regardless of their nationality and where they currently live. That is, an
American living in Singapore, a Japanese child living in Brazil, or German
child living in Canada will all develop and exhibit similar characteristics.
As such, Pollock and Van Reken reason that, “TCKs are not a
new phenomenon. They have been around since the beginning of time but, until
now, they have been largely invisible.”[3] Therefore, this model was
used to study the TCKs that lived during the Babylonian exile. It used modern
research on TCKs and cross cultural experiences to try to better understand the
choices, actions, and behaviors as seen in the Old Testament Scriptures. Esther
was a Jewess, living in Susa, the capital of Persia. She, therefore, was
constantly stepping into two different worlds: the religious and cultural
heritage of her parents as children of Israel, and the religiously plural and
secular society of the Persians.
Esther was an orphan adopted by her cousin, Mordecai (Esther
2:7). The Bible does not give details as to how old she was when she lost her
parents or the situation under which they died. It may be assumed, though, that
from a young age she received an informal education that consisted of instruction
in parenting, food preparation and preservation, tending small city gardens, running
a household, and producing textiles.[4] With the other women in
the community, she would have learned the social customs, moral values,
religious beliefs and rituals of the Jewish people.[5] Being that Mordecai was
most likely part of a noble family; Esther would have lived a life of some
affluence.
A study done by Kate A. Walters and Faith P. Auton-Cuff
analyzes how growing up as a TCK shapes a woman’s identity. Walters and
Auton-Cuff found that because women define themselves in terms of relationship
and connection, any movement between cultures causes a disruption in their
identity formation. Thus, in a new place, the woman must first survive, adapt
and cope with the change before she can reform her identity based on the
relationships she develops around her.[6]. Unfortunately, often
times a woman’s voice is silenced as she tries to behave in an acceptable
fashion so as to be seen as “good” and develop relationships with others. Thus,
they put on a false self to be accepted and “fit in” at the cost of their true
selves.[7] In a community based
society, rebelling against the social norms, acting out, and causing problems
are greatly discouraged because of the difficulties it brought upon the family
and not just the individual.[8]
In light of Walters and Auton-Cuff’s research, Xerxes
project to find a new Queen sent Esther’s world spinning. She was taken away
from her home and family and put into a harem (Esther 2:8) where she would
eventually be used to satisfy the king’s lust.[9] In this new place she
struggled to define her identity while trying to adapt to the new situation.
Her value to the king is based largely on her appearance. Indeed, the Bible
records that Esther pleased Hegai, the eunuch in charge of the harem of virgins
(Esther 2:9). Her beauty was such that even a eunuch was moved by it.[10] The text also says that
she won Hegai’s favor. The term used for “favor” is actually hesed, which refers to the covenant
loyalty and love that existed between God and His people due to His covenant
with them. Thus, Esther gained from Hegai a covenant loyalty or a
special kindness that was not necessarily based on her beauty alone.[11]
In the
harem, Esther was isolated, and probably protected, from the other women
because Hegai had provided her with a private apartment and seven attendants
from the palace staff (Esther 2:9). But it also meant that she entered a new
place in the harem, and again had to go through the process of learning to
adapt, cope and build relationships. At this time she was under strict
instructions to not reveal her identity as a Jewess from Mordecai (Esther
2:10). Therefore, according to Walters and Auton-Cuff, Mordecai’s command to
her effectively silenced her true self and required her to put on a false self.
Therefore, the year spent under Hegai’s care was one in which she lived as the
other women did and did not give away her ethnicity by adhering to the food laws
in the Torah.[12]
As she prepared for her night with the king, she was aided by seven women who
were of a different nationality than herself.[13]
The close contact with these women would have exposed Esther to the different
policies, practices, and moral values of Persian women in the palace court.
Esther’s story communicates how hard it can truly be to live
as a Christian in the real world, and how easy it is to conceal one’s identity
and just “go with the flow.” However God calls us to be lights to a world of
darkness, therefore blending in is
not a long term option. In the next post I will talk about Esther’s move into
her new role as Queen, and her actions as Queen of Persia.
[1] David C. Pollock and Ruth
E. Van Reken, Third Culture Kids: Growing
Up Among Worlds (Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2009).
[2]
Pollock & Van Reken, 13.
[3]
Pollock & Van Reken, 4.
[4]
Leo G. Perdue, “Israelite and Early Jewish Family: Summary and Conclusions” in Families in Ancient Israel by Leo G.
Perdue, Joseph Blenkinsopp, John J. Collings and Carol Meyers (Louisville:
Westminster John Knox Press, 1997), 172.
[5]
Perdue, 172.
[6]
Kate A. Walters and Faith P. Auton-Cuff, “A Story to Tell: The identity
development of women growing up as third culture kids,” Mental Health, Religion and Culture 12, no. 7 (November 2009):
762-763.
[7]
Walters and Auton-Cuff, 766.
[8]
Walters and Auton-Cuff, 765.
[9]
Jon D. Levenson, Esther: A Commentary, The
Old Testament Library (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997), 58.
[10]
Mervin Breneman, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther,
New American Commentary 10 (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1993), 316.
[11]
Breneman, 316.
[12]
Breneman, 316
[13]
Joyce G. Baldwin, Esther, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1984), 67.
We can learn a lot from this book and the character of Esther. I'm excited to be studying this and to read your perspective on her and Mordecai.
ReplyDelete