Wednesday, November 7, 2012

A little on Nehemiah...Part 2




Today’s post will discuss why Nehemiah was perfectly suited for his role as governor in Judah.
The office of Cupbearer to the king, which Nehemiah held, was a high ranking office and a potentially risky one (Nehemiah 1:11). The royal cupbearer was required to pour wine into the royal cup and then taste it to test whether the drink was poisoned.[1] However, the direct access which the cupbearer had to the king made this position very influential. Williamson states that, “[cupbearers] were also expected to be convivial and tactful companions to the king. Being very much in his confidence, they could thus wield considerable influence by way of informal counsel and discussion.”[2] Therefore, Nehemiah was not just a servant to the king, he was a close confidant, and this is recognized by the king’s apparent concern over his downcast expression on his face in 2:2.

As Cupbearer, Nehemiah was able to observe the king and other officials as they conducted business regarding all kinds of matters and with all kinds of people. This experience in and of itself would have given Nehemiah insight into the appropriate way to ask the king for a leave of absence as well has the best time to do so. Ezra 4:21 indicates that it was this same Artaxerxes who issued the command to stop construction in the city of Jerusalem.[3] Nehemiah was, therefore, asking the king to reverse a prior decree. He made his petition in the month of “Nisan” which was the first month of the New Year according to the Persian calendar.[4] In 2:6, it is mentioned that the queen was in attendance with the king. Now, the queen did not regularly attend court with the king so it is very possible that Nehemiah would have approached the king looking downcast at a feast or festival to celebrate the New Year (Nehemiah 2:1-2). Furthermore, there is evidence that at certain feasts and celebrations, the king showed generosity and granted some of the requests of his people or officers.[5] Therefore, Nehemiah was also able to maneuver himself and use the knowledge he had gained at court to gain his request to help his people.

Nehemiah was very aware that he was risking much with his request. In his story he indicated that he was afraid and that he prayed to God before outlining his petition. He communicated clearly the reason he was sad and made his request with great diplomacy to return to “the city in Judah” (Nehemiah 2:2-3). By avoiding the mention of Jerusalem he avoided bringing up Artaxerxes’ previous decree that construction must stop. The request to return to his ethnic home must have come as a surprise to the king, because the text does not give any indication that Nehemiah had previously desired to return to Jerusalem.[6] Indeed, he was an example of the fact that some of the Jews in exile attained high positions politically and economically and as such did not necessarily wish to return to Judah.[7]

Nevertheless, the king accepts Nehemiah’s change of heart towards his homeland, and granted that he might have a leave of absence for a time and gave him all the required documents he would need as well as an escort for safe travel (2:7-8). Nehemiah proclaims in 2:8b that “the hand of my God was upon me.” This phrase is exactly like the one quoted in Ezra several times (7:6, 9, 28, 8:18, 22, 31).[8] It indicates that what seems to be the gracious grant of the king is actually “a channel through which the King of kings reaches his people.”[9] Therefore, Nehemiah, while being a high ranking Persian official, was also an instrument of God that was used to restore His city. Furthermore, Nehemiah’s experience in the Persian court gave him the political know-how to deal with his new position as governor, his enemies in Judea and Samaria, and the traitors within the Jewish community.[10]

God was preparing Nehemiah to restore His city from a very young age. I am sure that the leaders of his day could have seen God’s plan they would have suggested a different career route for Nehemiah that they believed would have made him more influential in Jerusalem. However, God’s plan was perfect. Nehemiah had a close relationship with the King, and was able to get support from him for God’s work. We can’t always tell how certain situations, jobs, or projects are going to help us later in life. This is where we must trust that God is bringing all things together for the good of those who love Him (Romans 8:28). Consider the possibility that right now, you are in training for a particular purpose that God has created you, and only you, for. To ensure we get the full training we will need, we must be obedient and faithful to God, depending on His word and strength to see us through each and every day.

One last word on Nehemiah, in Matthew 10:16, Jesus says, “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as snakes but innocent as doves.” Nehemiah is a great example of this. He used his knowledge to give himself the best possible chance to succeed in asking the king to return to his homeland and restore the city of Jerusalem, but was innocent of any foul play. God calls us to be smart, clever, and to use what we know and can do to help ourselves and others, but we must also be innocent of any sin. We do not do illegal things or threaten to get the end result, as many others would. This is what makes us different. We are intelligent, clever, and wise, but also gentle, tactful, and innocent.


[1] Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire (Winona Lake, Eisenbrauns, 2002), 264.

[2] H.G.M. Williamson, Ezra, Nehemiah, Word Biblical Commentary, Vol 16 (Waco: Word Books Publishers, 1985), 174.

[3] Mervin Breneman, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, New American Commentary, Vol 10 (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1993), 173.

[4] Breneman, 175.

[5] Breneman, 175.

[6] Williamson, Ezra, Nehemiah, 175.

[7] Charles F. Fensham, The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah, (Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans, 1982),  157.

[8] Williamson, Ezra, Nehemiah, 93.

[9] Williamson, Ezra, Nehemiah, 93.

[10] Derek Kidner, Ezra & Nehemiah (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1979), 13.


No comments:

Post a Comment